4 ms·
Looks like OP's accounting is based on the sunk cost from years ago rather than the cost of replacing the service, which suggests that they value the service at
by stevenwliao 9y ago
Looks like OP's accounting is based on the sunk cost from years ago rather than the cost of replacing the service, which suggests that they value the service at less than $15.
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 9y agoWell, maybe, but I think it is much more common for people to just assume that somehow a company has the right to unilaterally cancel any contract if they pay back the customer, and that current valuation and stuff simply don't enter people's minds when considering such situations.