3 ms·
In other news, Network/facility with normally lax/low security requirements utilizes normally lax/low security protocols to protect it, author creates piece co
by cat199 9y ago
In other news,
Network/facility with normally lax/low security requirements utilizes normally lax/low security protocols to protect it, author creates piece conflating regular security levels processes with those needed for certain high security visitors who utilize differing security protocols when visiting said facillities.
alternately:
Public world not so secure! High security figures should use high security when visiting!
- wavefunction 9y agoThat's why Mar-a-Lago guests were taking pictures with the guy who carries around the nuclear football and posting them on social media, complete with (unblurred in other copies) face. Because the security is so great there. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mar-a-lago-hotel-guest-nuclear-football-donald-trump-shinzo-abe-japan-pm-north-korea-missile-test-a7578366.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics... Trump is a security chump.
- jacquesm 9y agoSo is the independent. Trivial to run that through tin-eye.
- zie 9y agoExactly, this is like zero surprise. I see AD deployed all the time without SSL/TLS. They always answer "but it's internal only, who cares?!"
- vec 9y agoOf course this isn't a surprise to any of the HN crowd, but it is still good to have publicly documented. Plus it sets journalists up to ask more pointed questions. It's the difference between "What measures are being taken to ensure the security of Mar-a-Lago during the President's visits?" and "Given ProPublica's dismal analysis of Mar-a-Lago's normal security, what additional security measures are being taken during the President's visits?". The first is a softball, the second applies real political pressure to get it right.
- vaishaksuresh 9y agoI would agree with you if Trump did not make super sensitive decisions and meet with other heads of state there.