3 ms·
"NoDak" is a bad example - that state is fairly well off and organized. Years ago they got it their head that having 100% cell coverage was a good idea so they
by RijilV 9y ago
"NoDak" is a bad example - that state is fairly well off and organized. Years ago they got it their head that having 100% cell coverage was a good idea so they did it. New federal recommendations for shoulder width so they went and redid their roads. The /tiny/ ILEC that serves my family farm years ago ripped out all of their copper and only runs fiber.
If someone got it in their head that non-gas cars were what they should be doing in North Dakota, it would happen.
I think poorer states with more conflicted interest would have a harder time.
(Sorry for the OT NoDak rant)
- neogodless 9y agoThanks for clarifying! I thought about population density, but of course there are lots of other variables!
- HillaryBriss 9y agoDoesn't NoDak, a state with a relatively small population, get a large percentage of its cash from oil revenues?
- protomyth 9y agoTo a point, but a lot of it goes in the future fund. North Dakota is still a farming state and #1 honey producer of the USA. Oil will probably last quite a while given the costs keep dropping as the technology progresses, but the state is mindful of a bust since its happened before.
- pythonaut_16 9y agoAre you saying that NoDak has generally available fiber internet at reasonable prices?
- protomyth 9y agoYep. Rural electrics, local telephone companies, and some cable companies have fiber. It probably is a function of most places now having multiple providers. [edit: examples] https://www.bektel.com/products-amp-services/bekfiber/ https://www.bektel.com/products-amp-services/bekfiber/ https://www.gondtc.com/internet_services.html https://www.gondtc.com/internet_services.html ignore the 90's style websites
- RijilV 9y agoIn the rural parts of the state, yes. That ends up being roughly 60% of the state[0]. In terms of pricing, my family who's nearest neighbors are over a mile away pay less each month than I do for more bandwidth than I get, and I live in a major tech hub. There's a bit of encouragement from the state government and the rural providers also get free money that everyone else in these United [sic] States pays on their telecommunications bills. However it is still a good example of what can be accomplished in consumer Internet if not for the mega-corporations we have doing it today. If a small provider who's customers are frequently over a mile apart can do fiber to the home, why can't we have the same in metros? The one disadvantage is the transit providers they plug into aren't the best - IIRC I was going through cogent in MSP to get to most popular cloud providers. Their network is worth looking at though[1][2] 0: http://www.csgmidwest.org/policyresearch/0616-fiber-optic-North-Dakota.aspx http://www.csgmidwest.org/policyresearch/0616-fiber-optic-No... 1: http://dakotacarrier.com/services/overview/ http://dakotacarrier.com/services/overview/ 2: http://broadband.nd.gov/nd-broadband-map http://broadband.nd.gov/nd-broadband-map
- protomyth 9y agoThe general dynamic of North Dakota has always been a bit of an amazement to me. Its like "nope, not gonna do it" to "let's get on with it, oops done" happens like a flip of the switch. I think folks give too little credit to a farm state's love of "better". Its a weird, stubborn, leap-style advance on getting stuff done.