9 ms·
I'm a child and adolescent forensic psychiatrist. The omission of psychopathy from the DSM was a considered decision, but not everyone agreed with it. People w
by phren0logy 9y ago
I'm a child and adolescent forensic psychiatrist. The omission of psychopathy from the DSM was a considered decision, but not everyone agreed with it.
People with psychopathy often exhibit antisocial / criminal behavior, but not everyone who exhibits criminal behavior has the deficit of empathy that characterizes psychopathy.
I work in juvenile prisons, and most of the kids have had a very difficult life and have never been able to trust or rely on the adults in their lives who were supposed to take care of them. Almost all of these, with patience and kindness, can learn what it means to trust someone. Others struggle with it, and don't grasp the value of other people beyond what that person can do for them.
What I do think is much sensationalized is the idea that psychopaths enjoy violence. This can be true, but is hardly a hallmark. Most of them are best described as callous, and are not deterred by the effect of their actions on others, but aren't violent for the sake of being violent.
- jorvi 9y agoI always make this mental distinction: to psychopaths, emotions are alien, including fear. That's why they _can_ be such remorseless killers, almost not caring about self-preservation. They'd look at a distressed human like we'd look at a twittering bird. Next to this are sociopaths, who actually have emotions, understand them in others, but only care for themselves and thus game the entire system of human interaction. A psychopath would be able to stab a bystander `because he looked at me funny-like` whereas a sociopath would abhor this violence, but _would_ be okay with gaming his parents out of €50,000, use this to set up a fake investment company, con 20,000 people out of their retirement savings and then just disappear. Is there any grounds to this distinction?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]