2 ms·
They are obviously worth at least $2M and other ones want to continue, and apply some mental tricks to lower OP's share as she is obviously inexperienced/mental
by bitL 9y ago
They are obviously worth at least $2M and other ones want to continue, and apply some mental tricks to lower OP's share as she is obviously inexperienced/mentally weak (otherwise wouldn't post such a worded article on HN but instead went maximizing her returns). They can anytime offer a buyout (3-5x times what her share is worth right now), but they don't.
- sah2ed 9y ago> ... as she is obviously inexperienced/mentally weak Unless you can read mental states from behind an internet comment, there was no need to resort to ad hominem to characterize the OP.
- bitL 9y agoThere is absolutely no ad hominem. It's simply a very well known fact that when it comes to money, people turn into sharks and prey on inexperienced or weak, which in our (still) idealistic business is a majority. And the original post radiates insecurity (by default the mindset "I have to give up something as somebody told me to"); somebody has to step in and tell her "please don't be insecure, you have 33%, that's your starting point, don't allow pressure from your partners force you to make a stupid decision".