4 ms·
No response...I think these are companies that have GraphQL APIs, but no actual relationship with Graphcool. They shouldn't be listed as customers.
by zenithm 9y ago
No response...I think these are companies that have GraphQL APIs, but no actual relationship with Graphcool. They shouldn't be listed as customers.
- sorenbs 9y agoSorry about the delay here, it was a busy night for us. The enterprise page is targeted decision makers in big companies who might have been sent there by the dev team. As such our main objective is to communicate that GraphQL is a proven technology. We will make that more explicit on the page. Some of these companies actually do use Graphcool for small projects and prototyping, but that is not the story we want to tell on this page.
- user15672 9y agoAs a decision maker, this kind of dishonesty will ensure I can't do business with you. It's a customer list and nowhere does it state that they just use GraphQL and are not your direct customers. I know you're trying to get some traction and all that, but this makes your whole offering look dodgy
- zenithm 9y agoAgree, I understand you need to have referenceable customers...but you have to actually...like...have them. I would imagine you are violating restrictions around the use of these companies trademarks. Similarly confused by the random logos on the homepage with no context. The implication is they somehow rely on Graphcool.