5 ms·
This comment is a reply to many of the commenters here on HN, rather than a direct response to the article. How do you get to the point of debating the differe
by developer2 9y ago
This comment is a reply to many of the commenters here on HN, rather than a direct response to the article.
How do you get to the point of debating the difference between soda vs. diet soda, as if it's a must-have treat and you are "simply" choosing the lesser of two evils? All soda is UNEQUIVOCALLY bad for one's health! You're drinking a cocktail of chemicals that has no nutritional value, and designed to be addictive. Artificial sweeteners are a gimmick to allow us to recuse ourselves from the innate knowledge of what it is healthy. Selecting a supposedly "healthier alternative" is nothing more than a way to grant ourselves asylum from being personally responsible for our choices. We pretend that our "science" is universally proven evidence backed by chemistry and physics, vs. the truth: it's a manmade lie which no enlightened species would tout as being scientifically valid.
The same mental masturbatuion occurs with vaping. "Vaping is better than smoking!" As if inhaling any mind-altering drug is necessary to "get by", and so it must surely be "better" to attach oneself to the "least worst option", rather than kicking the habit entirely. If vaping is "better" than smoking, what is better than vaping? Oh right, not inhaling anything other than the air we evolved to breathe. Your body wasn't made to inhale chemicals not produced in nature; it was also not made to drink soda. The fact that you don't die instantly from consuming such products does not mean they are not harmful.
The excuses many people make regarding their health is... I'm going to call it what it is: completely and utterly _PATHETIC_. As a species we pretend we are intelligent, but a vast percentage (90-95%?) of the population can't even overcome the most primal appetite for fats, sweets and drugs. Our species will never be capable of rightfully calling itself "enlightened" until we drop all desires for this kind of bullshit. If you're playing mind games with yourself to allow you to "cheat just a little" by consuming unhealthy products, while falsely duping yourself into believing your decisions somehow result in an overall net positive "compared to the (unnecessary) alternatives", you're deluding yourself.
Advice to all alien civilizations: avoid us at all costs. Making contact with us cannot possibly be beneficial to you. We'll either bomb you out of fear and ignorance, or bombard you with our capitalist bullshit in order to pull you into our way of living that will ultimately destroy you from the inside out.
What makes this truly disgusting is that people who choose to destroy their bodies - by drinking diet soda, vaping, or eating junk food - are in fact aware that they are lying to themselves. You know that you are making the wrong choices, but opt for the fallacy that somehow you are not in control. Nobody really believes the marketing companies are pushing out. People are just looking for someone else to give them permission to be unhealthy, desperately listening for someone to tell them what they want to hear. People know they are too weak to have self-control, and are looking for a voice to be their scapegoat.
tldr; Diet soda is not "better" than soda laden with unadulterated sugar. It is simply worse than water, and the fluids you would get from fruits, vegetables, and free-range animals and fish. Allow your brain's thought processes to align with your species' natural evolution. Stop using product manufacturers' claims as a scapegoat. Think for yourself, and don't make excuses.
Edit: To those downvoting: do you downvote because my post is too long and you declined to actually read it, or do you refute the facts? I am normally abrasive in general, but what I've said here really is true. Anyone who reads the whole thing, and still downvotes, is someone with their head in the sand. You can be part of the 90-95% of morons I mentioned earlier. Be the reason our species is doomed, for all I care.
- Singletoned 9y agoI think people are downvoting it because you are ranting. A general heuristic that is useful in life is that if someone is foaming at the mouth and shouting, the things they say probably aren't that useful. (And you definitely come across like that. EG someone scanning the text would see "_PATHETIC_", and would assume that the emotional part of your brain has been engaged rather than the rational part). The use very early on of "All soda is UNEQUIVOCALLY bad for one's health!", probably put a lot of people off. It is trivially hard to refute (any example of any soda providing any health benefit (eg rehydration) proves you wrong), and again makes it seem like you are making illogical, emotional arguments. The use of "Anyone who reads the whole thing, and still downvotes, is someone with their head in the sand" is a cheap nasty trick that will turn people against you even if they agree with you. Try waiting until you have calmed down and rewriting it in a better way.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- developer2 9y agoThe edit, insulting even further, was useless on my part. If I think that up to 95% of people - and I sincerely believe the percentage to be that high - are incapable of realizing that substituting diet soda and vaping in lieu of sugar soda and smoking cigarettes equates to "healthier choices", I should have expected 95% downvotes. My mistake, born from a delusion of my own making, is believing that the entirety of the HN crowd magically falls within the <= 5% of people I consider to be legitimately intelligent, capable of thought relying on science that is universally proven to be true rather than manmade speculation based on tomfoolery. Without seeing any replies countering my statements, I can only assume that these people are petty enough to vote with their trigger-happy index finger rather than taking the time to absorb - and perhaps reply to - the points of discussion I have raised. Aside, meta: Please do not vote on this comment. By upvoting, you'd be granting my ego a reprieve. By downvoting, you'd be proving my point and also feed my ego. Best bet is to abstain, and let bygones be bygones. This could be -10 or +10 and I'd feel validated. Just don't vote; a 0-1 score says more than anything.
- douche 9y ago