2 ms·
First hit on Google[1] shows one study about it being 94% of jobs created from 2005 to 2015. So doesn't seem like a stretch so long as you agree with the "the a
by hysan 9y ago
First hit on Google[1] shows one study about it being 94% of jobs created from 2005 to 2015. So doesn't seem like a stretch so long as you agree with the "the actual way the us defines a job was changed under Bush and kept under Obama" part of the premise.
Edit: More reading of other articles suggests that this is true for the 2009 to present timespan. Quote[2]:
> The bottom line is: Almost all of the job gains under President Obama have been in so-called service jobs, such as those in Silicon Valley and consulting. Others are the low-end jobs, toiling in stores and restaurants.
Every job described in that sentence sounds like a temp job.
[1] https://qz.com/851066/almost-all-the-10-million-jobs-created-since-2005-are-temporary/ https://qz.com/851066/almost-all-the-10-million-jobs-created...
[2] http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/news/economy/jobs-under-obama/ http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/news/economy/jobs-under-obam...