It is quite interesting from a strategy perspective of the agreeing third party security companies. If (for this or the alleged Russia DNC hack) clear evidence

It is quite interesting from a strategy perspective of the agreeing third party security companies. If (for this or the alleged Russia DNC hack) clear evidence arises that completely contradict the reports they have put out (paid for by whom?) it could potentially be catastrophic to their business. In these circumstance then at some point the company would have had to essentially doctor evidence to support the required conclusion. If unequivocal evidence arises that is contrary to this, then it would be a massive deal. How could they explain away their findings? I am not making any judgements on if the above happened, but it will be interesting to follow in this particular case which appears to clearly point to weev.