4 ms·
"Blew" is the preterit form of blow, so in this case wouldn't it be based off of the past participle "blown" and be whistleblown?
by Orangeair 9y ago
"Blew" is the preterit form of blow, so in this case wouldn't it be based off of the past participle "blown" and be whistleblown?
- Cyph0n 9y agoIs "whisteblew" even a word? It sounds off to me.
- comex 9y agoThe usual term is "blew the whistle". I've never heard "whistleblow" used as a verb.
- munchbunny 9y agoIt's not. "whistleblower" is a commonly used compound noun, and "whistle-blow" is starting to enter usage, but in common usage, it's "blow the whistle" and "blew the whistle."
- emodendroket 9y agohttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whistle_blow https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whistle_blow Apparently the OP isn't the first to use it and it's kind of a predictable back-formation.
- mannykannot 9y agoBoth "whistleblew" and "whistleblown" seem awkward to me, though I am not enough of a grammarian to explain why (the latter sounds to me to more appropriate to the company than the person, in analogy to "wind-blown sand".) Maybe this is a case of impractical verbing^H^H^H^H^H^H^H formation of a verb from a noun.