5 ms·
That's neat looking, though it isn't doing anything for me. What are the things you tried to do? Can someone else with stereoscopic vision tell me if it's doi
by JeffJenkins 16y ago
That's neat looking, though it isn't doing anything for me. What are the things you tried to do? Can someone else with stereoscopic vision tell me if it's doing anything for them?
I'm really interested in 3D techniques which work for people without the brain mechanisms to fuse the images of their eyes (unsurprisingly).
- moron4hire 16y agoWell, from this Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy The techniques I'm using are: == Stereopsis: in this case, simple linear transformation in X-axis proportional to Z-axis as an approximation to a real 3D transformation == Occlusion of one object by another: basic Z sorting, i.e. "painters algorithm" == Subtended visual angle of an object of known size: I scale the object size proportional to its distance in the Z-axis == Haze, desaturation, and a shift to bluishness: I interpolate the object color proportional to its distance in the Z-axis If you can get the effect to work well, it goes from being a fairly incomprehensible jumble of grey circles (too information-dense for 2D display) to a box of bouncing balls where you can easily track individual objects as they move around. EDIT: looking at the code, it seems I forgot about a technique that I used! I also threw in the "Vertical position" bullet point from the Wikipedia article, but without a frame of reference in the rendered scene you wouldn't be able to tell.
- bradleyland 16y agoThis particular example requires that you cross your eyes to 'overlap' the two images, so those without good sight in both eyes will not perceive any depth.