3 ms·
The guidelines are unclear if the article uses another article as a direct source, but adds additional content. The Quartz article does use Wired as a primary s
by yladiz 9y ago
The guidelines are unclear if the article uses another article as a direct source, but adds additional content. The Quartz article does use Wired as a primary source, but it also adds additional content as the Wired article doesn't mention daycare at all. Additionally, the comments on this post pretty much all talk about daycare as it's in the title and a major talking point of the article, rather than just the building itself.
- dang 9y agoYup those are fair points, making this a borderline call. I'm not sure the article adds much of value—it struck me as a slapdash effort to gin up controversy, especially at the end. That's most of what such publications do all day and our job as a community is to filter most of that out. But people can reasonably differ about any particular case.
- yladiz 9y agoFair enough, although I do respect Quartz enough to not create controversy for the hell of it. I do agree that the last paragraph is a bit much and possibly unnecessary, and maybe only there to make it seem something more than it is, but I think the article overall brings a good question to think about, considering the magnitude of the building Apple made and the attention to detail they brought to the project.