4 ms·

Thanks a lot Pier! - File storage is not where we want to earn our money. Please get in touch if you have a use case that would be prohibitively expensive with

Thanks a lot Pier! - File storage is not where we want to earn our money. Please get in touch if you have a use case that would be prohibitively expensive with the current pricing so we can figure something out. - More granular permissions for machine clients is something that is high on our priority. We are currently prototyping different ways to integrate it with our Permission Query system, and want to make sure we get this right before releasing. - I think it would be awesome if someone would create an open source content editor for GraphQL apis. It wouldn't even have to be specific to Graphcool. - Implementing a REST API is something we are considering. We see very little demand for this feature though, so not likely to happen in the near future.

pier25 9y ago
> File storage is not where we want to earn our money Why not sell storage at cost + 15% or something similar? You could also simply offer some type of GCS or S3 integration so that your users would provide their own buckets but use your fantastic API. > I think it would be awesome if someone would create an open source content editor for GraphQL apis. Hmmmmm (wheels turning)
- sorenbs 9y ago
  Great feedback. We have some planned integrations between file storage and the GraphQL API. We want to make sure we understand our cost structure before we commit to a price point.