3 ms·
I don't know that that's true. I'm by no means, even remotely, an expert. But it sounds like you've got a "hidden variables" take on it; that you're suggestin
by skygazer 9y ago
I don't know that that's true. I'm by no means, even remotely, an expert. But it sounds like you've got a "hidden variables" take on it; that you're suggesting the probability wave is our statistical prediction of a systems state limited by our ignorance, which is what Einstein believed, and has been since contradicted by physical experiment showing violation of Bell's inequality? Am I mistaken? Feel free to correct me.
- gaze 9y agoAh that's not what I'm saying but it's subtle. Access to hidden variables, if they existed, would allow you to predict a measurement outcome. I'm not saying that. I'm saying the wave function is a tool that allows you to write down all the correlations. In other words, the wave function is a tool that allows you to reproduce all the probability distributions