3 ms·
> Even if the book is fine There is the crux of your... argument. How about you read the book and then come back? You sure have a lot to say about something yo
by Noseshine 9y ago
> Even if the book is fine
There is the crux of your... argument. How about you read the book and then come back? You sure have a lot to say about something you never looked at.
You can't improve how "the other side" is arguing (or not arguing), but you sure have 100% control over your own behavior and discussion habits. Attacking the people instead of the work is as bad as it gets, especially if you never even set eye on the latter. I won't read it either, but I don't have an opinion about it that I'm trying to share.
- WalterBright 9y agoLooks like I'm the only person who ever read the book :-( https://www.amazon.com/Regulation-Pharmaceutical-Innovation-Amendments-Evaluative/dp/0844731285/ https://www.amazon.com/Regulation-Pharmaceutical-Innovation-... BTW, it was published in 1987, long before climate change became a thing.
- dkural 9y agoreading a book is a significant investment of time. when published by untrustworthy institutions, i am not willing to make that investment.