3 ms·
It likely won't, that's true. My point remains though: With storage that cheap and lossless audio sources widely available, why would you not use the lossless o
by thirdsun 9y ago
It likely won't, that's true. My point remains though: With storage that cheap and lossless audio sources widely available, why would you not use the lossless option?
- tfinniga 9y agoWhy not both? MP3 is more widely supported than any lossless audio codec. Lossless compression enables the collector to keep an original. Not everyone is a collector though - for them, MP3 is probably fine, and if they need a different format later they'll probably just stream, re-encode, or re-purchase, in order of likelihood.