3 ms·
We can't even get people off SHA1 to SHA2 "because of lower performance." Somehow I doubt the "1 terrabit RSA key" would go over well with them. I think there'
by mtgx 10y ago
We can't even get people off SHA1 to SHA2 "because of lower performance." Somehow I doubt the "1 terrabit RSA key" would go over well with them.
I think there's a much better chance we move off to still slower, but not as slow, quantum-resistant crypto algorithms, than just much larger RSA keys.
- snakeanus 10y agoGPG even disabled the generation of RSA keys over 4kib.
- blacksmythe 10y ago>> We can't even get people off SHA1 to SHA2 "because of lower performance." Somehow I doubt the "1 terrabit RSA key" would go over well with them. So apparently we are going to need quantum processors to generate encryption that is resistant to quantum processors.