4 ms·
The article says the banana equivalent dose concept was intended to ridicule people who were afraid of nuclear power plant accidents. Such accidents would expo
by delackner 16y ago
The article says the banana equivalent dose concept was intended to ridicule people who were afraid of nuclear power plant accidents. Such accidents would expose people to radioactive iodine, which, in the article itself says: "The combination of bioaccumulation and the greater penetrating power of ionizing Gamma radiation makes radioactive Iodine significantly more hazardous to humans than equivalent amounts of Potassium-40".
So no, being in the vicinity of a nuclear accident at dose X of Gamma + Beta radiation in the form of iodine that is going to be absorbed into the thyroid (leading to continued further exposure) cannot be meaningfully compared to the same dose of just Beta radiation from potassium that is passed through the body and excreted.
- ramchip 16y agoMy point is that gamma/beta radiation is not "in the form of iodine". Iodine releases radiation; this radiation is the same, wherever it came from. Gamma and beta radiations can in fact be meaningfully compared on their effect on the body. The nature of the rays is taken into account when calculating the rem dose. See the radiation quality factors: http://www.nuclear.utah.edu/class_notes/5700/sup_9.doc http://www.nuclear.utah.edu/class_notes/5700/sup_9.doc