> No, it is not. Then your assertion they are pro-terrorist doesn't make any sense. Helping to free people who were tortured at some point during their captiv

> No, it is not. Then your assertion they are pro-terrorist doesn't make any sense. Helping to free people who were tortured at some point during their captivity isn't the same as being "pro-terrorist". Being a civil rights group that opposes mistreatment of prisoners is going to lead to you representing or seeking to free unsavory people on the basis of their mistreatment (rather than their innocence).