This is both right and wrong.... Intel's "10nm" ~= to TSMC's "7nm", so they are right that their "10nm" is a lot less dense than Intel's "10nm", but they both

This is both right and wrong.... Intel's "10nm" ~= to TSMC's "7nm", so they are right that their "10nm" is a lot less dense than Intel's "10nm", but they both ship are around the same time, so this means that there's really no difference in terms of time to market. It's true that the node names are messed up, but Intel acting as if they have the "moore-al high ground" and they "aren't marketers" rubs me the wrong way because from "32nm" and "40nm" and below, Intel's node was far less dense than the industry standard.