4 ms·
The QBASIC help "file" was really good for its time. That's basically how I learned. That plus a collection of QBASIC programs the nerds at my school passed a
by hangonhn 9y ago
The QBASIC help "file" was really good for its time. That's basically how I learned. That plus a collection of QBASIC programs the nerds at my school passed around and would occasionally add to. Basically, I would open one of those programs up, run it in QBASIC, and if it is awesome, I would try to figure out how it worked. If I came across something I didn't understand, I would pull up the help from QBASIC.
My childhood self-learning experience is a good example of the importance of:
1. "open source"
2. a fast code-run cycle
QBASIC, being an interpreted, pretty much guaranteed these two conditions inadvertently.
- eropple 9y agoOh, man. QBASIC's manuals were fantastic and they set an expectation for documentation when I was, like, 7 that would rapidly be disappointed by basically everything that I touched for years afterwards.
- khedoros1 9y agoIf I'm remembering correctly, QB 1.1's manual was good, and QB 4.5's was amazing, with deeper explanations, example code, and such.