> definitely something not transparent > something foul I wouldn't be so confident. The article doesn't have a lot of information, the article was posted bef

> definitely something not transparent > something foul I wouldn't be so confident. The article doesn't have a lot of information, the article was posted before, and there's not a lot to discuss except maybe local Silicon Valley politics. It comes across as a "tame rumor" piece rather than an announcement of something factual. It doesn't seem like foul play, or that anything is being censored. It just doesn't seem super noteworthy.