4 ms·
1. why are you posting on a new account? it is obvious by your edit that you post regularly on here. 2. the article has mostly the same exact info you've poste
by swang 9y ago
1. why are you posting on a new account? it is obvious by your edit that you post regularly on here.
2. the article has mostly the same exact info you've posted. what "extreme media bias" are you talking about?
3. you write that their trade secret claims are an "overreach" yet that is only half the story. the judge thought most of the claims were weak, but that there was sufficient evidence to issue the injunction. so there were valid trade secret claims.
> Uber likely knew or at least should have known that Levandowski had taken and retained possession of Waymo’s confidential files. Waymo has also sufficiently shown, for purposes of the instant motion only, that the 14,000-plus purloined files likelycontain at least some trade secrets, and that some provisional relief is warranted while this case progresses toward trial.
So why don't you reveal yourself and explain why you are so pro-Uber? Because it seems likely you have something to hide.
- darwhy 9y agoWith how many questionable practices Uber is guilty of partaking in, I wouldn't be surprised if attempting to manipulate Hacker News was one of them.
- oculusthrift 9y agothink it's funny you say that when the company I see the most employees from on HN is Google.
- joshuamorton 9y ago(Fitting the rule, I'm a googler). It helps that Google employs about 10x as many people as Uber does. Its the same reason you see lots of Microsoft SWEs here.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- rotflmao 9y ago1) I don't post with my account in flamewar topics because of fanboy downvotes. 2) The article omits pretty much any important detail that is in favor of this boogeyman company so readers assume the absolute worst. Check out pfarnsworth's comments here to see that this is actually a ruling very much in Uber's favor. He did a better job of commenting than me. I'm also pro-Apple, pro-Monsanto, pro-Facebook and pro-every-other-company journalists love to hate and only tell one side of the story because I've personally seen my company maligned unfairly by the media.