2 ms·

You seem a nice chap, I'm not quite sure if you understand the real nature of the organisation you're sticking up for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law

by adnam 9y ago

You seem a nice chap, I'm not quite sure if you understand the real nature of the organisation you're sticking up for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10981050/The-evidence-shows-that-Cage-is-a-pro-terrorist-group.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/1098105...

valuearb 9y ago
Why did you link to an article that gives no evidence?
- adnam 9y ago
  The article employs an advanced technology called "hypertext" whereby you can click the links embedded within it to find out more.
  - valuearb 9y ago
    What is a psych evaluation supposed to tell me? The entire article is one sided assertions. Cage supports Aafia Siddiqui, but the article doesn't say why, or why it's wrong to support her. She was convicted, sure, but of what? "Five years later she reappeared in Ghazni, Afghanistan, was arrested by Afghan police and held for questioning. While in custody, Siddiqui told the FBI she had gone into hiding but later disavowed her testimony and stated she had been abducted and imprisoned. Supporters believe she was held captive at Bagram Air Force Base as a ghost prisoner—charges the US government denies. While in custody in Ghazni, police found documents and notes for making bombs plus containers of sodium cyanide in her possession. She was shot in the torso the next day by visiting U.S. FBI and Army personnel, allegedly after shooting at them with a rifle one of the interrogators had placed on the floor. She was extradited and flown to the US where in September 2008 she was indicted on charges of assault and attempted murder of a US soldier in the police station in Ghazni—charges she denied. She was convicted on 3 February 2010 and later sentenced to 86 years in prison." Seems pretty shady to me. Not unreasonable to think she might have been setup. Your posts are fact free smears of Cage.
    - adnam 9y ago
      I rather think Cage does the best job of "smearing" itself, bit there are always well-meaning people like yourself who stick up for them.
      - valuearb 9y ago
        Again you only have fact free smears like the he use of "islamic pressure group". People have rights, even if Britain doesn't recognize them. Right to silence, right to disagreeable opinions, etc. thinking someone deserves release is no crime, even if you are wrong about it.

by adnam 9y ago

valuearb 9y ago

Why did you link to an article that gives no evidence?

adnam 9y ago
The article employs an advanced technology called "hypertext" whereby you can click the links embedded within it to find out more.
- valuearb 9y ago
  What is a psych evaluation supposed to tell me? The entire article is one sided assertions. Cage supports Aafia Siddiqui, but the article doesn't say why, or why it's wrong to support her. She was convicted, sure, but of what? "Five years later she reappeared in Ghazni, Afghanistan, was arrested by Afghan police and held for questioning. While in custody, Siddiqui told the FBI she had gone into hiding but later disavowed her testimony and stated she had been abducted and imprisoned. Supporters believe she was held captive at Bagram Air Force Base as a ghost prisoner—charges the US government denies. While in custody in Ghazni, police found documents and notes for making bombs plus containers of sodium cyanide in her possession. She was shot in the torso the next day by visiting U.S. FBI and Army personnel, allegedly after shooting at them with a rifle one of the interrogators had placed on the floor. She was extradited and flown to the US where in September 2008 she was indicted on charges of assault and attempted murder of a US soldier in the police station in Ghazni—charges she denied. She was convicted on 3 February 2010 and later sentenced to 86 years in prison." Seems pretty shady to me. Not unreasonable to think she might have been setup. Your posts are fact free smears of Cage.
  - adnam 9y ago
    I rather think Cage does the best job of "smearing" itself, bit there are always well-meaning people like yourself who stick up for them.
    - valuearb 9y ago
      Again you only have fact free smears like the he use of "islamic pressure group". People have rights, even if Britain doesn't recognize them. Right to silence, right to disagreeable opinions, etc. thinking someone deserves release is no crime, even if you are wrong about it.