6 ms·

It's not that simple though. What so you consider "data" when it comes to self driving cars? Waymo collects high resolution data with every car (multiple GB or

• taneq 9y ago
  They may not be sending data back home via the mobile network, but you can bet your boots they make exhaustive logs of Autopilot disengagements and store them locally to be siphoned off at the next service. I wonder if they have WiFi base stations collecting data at Supercharger points? That's what I'd do.
  • tehlike 9y ago
    Why not use owner's home network?
    • remus 9y ago
      The logs might be pretty big, so it might have a significant impact on people on metered internet connections.
      • drcross 9y ago
        Not if it's only greyscale camera data and some point cloud data which is heavily compressible.
        • nolok 9y ago
          But then you're back to square one : that data is much less detailed than what waymo gets.
          • drcross 9y ago
            Machine vision is usually an exercise in data reduction. Greyscale is typically used in most computer vision applications, so it may be the case that Waymo has more information but that is not necessarily of any benefit.
        • rileyphone 9y ago
          The video has constant motion though, which makes compression much less effective.
    • taneq 9y ago
      Do owners generally connect their cars to their home wifi? (I don't know, is this a thing with Teslas?) Even if so, uploading gigabytes of data every day is going to be noticed. While I'm sure they have the legal right to do so (via their TOS / EULA) they probably still don't want to emphasize that they're gathering that much data (unless you opt in to their fleet learning stuff).
      • drcross 9y ago
        >Do owners generally connect their cars to their home wifi? Generally I think they do to access the Tesla App features. Tesla also have a network connection so they may already be uploading the information anyway over cell networks.
      • cubano 9y ago
        Tesla's don't connect to LTE networks by default? If not, I find it shortsighted and rather cheap that each car doesn't have it's own $50/month data plan (or whatever) to phone home important data.
        • SallySwanSmith 9y ago
          At 80k new cars a year that's a 4mil a month waste of money. Tesla couldn't survive giving each car a 50/mo data plan forever.
          • cubano 9y ago
            Waste of money? To have a constant high speed IoT-like connection to the web for real-time updating and such? I am sure some sort of volume discounts could be negotiated as well.
        • greglindahl 9y ago
          Teslas do connect to LTE. Why would they pay that much for a data plan? In the US, you can get mobile hotspot plans for $3/month + $10/gbyte. That's the consumer price; wholesale over 100s of thousands of cars has got to be cheaper.
    • ehsankia 9y ago
      I definitely wouldn't be happy about Tesla uploading gigabytes of data on my metered connection. Even if it was unmetered, most people don't have very fast up-speeds and that could take days to upload and heavily impact their speeds. Absolutely unacceptable.
      • tehlike 9y ago
        What if they had agreement with xfinity/comcast, which opens up a separate wifi hotspot anyway?
  • euyyn 9y ago
    > exhaustive logs of Autopilot disengagements That would still be only one slice of the many many situations you need to master, and that Waymo already has. E.g. something as simple as entering and exiting a small roundabout, like that YouTube video showed a Tesla couldn't do. Miles driven by Tesla owners aren't purposefully looking for those situations when they engage autopilot.
    • taneq 9y ago
      Are you sure? Again this is just how I'd do things, but after I had a bunch of disengagement snapshots, the next thing I'd do is start taking snapshots of similar situations. We live in an age of easy and super-accurate image classification, it wouldn't be too hard to start a snapshot every time the front camera view contains a roundabout.
      • euyyn 9y ago
        What I'm trying to say is that the number of cars on the road and miles driven aren't what matter to their autopilot learning, when compared to other self-driving companies. Most people use their car to go places comfortably, not to look out for learning experiences for Tesla. With how long commutes are in the US, a very very small fraction of miles driven by people on autopilot will be other than "the car was already on the highway, autopilot changed lanes a few times, and after a while was manually disengaged to take an exit". That small fraction is what could be compared with the miles and number of cars driven by the other companies, because in the latter case it's hired drivers actively looking for conditions of interest to the engineers.