4 ms·
> Not really. There are several fields that have two types of learning material available: most basic and trivial stuff only good for showing off at parties and
by gravypod 9y ago
> Not really. There are several fields that have two types of learning material available: most basic and trivial stuff only good for showing off at parties and academic books and papers, too difficult to learn from without guidance.
Do you have an example? I can't think of anything in my field, computer science, that can't be learned by self-experimentation and reading.
A good example of more hands-on science learning would be Cody from Cody's Lab who has claimed to have done similar experiments dating back to his early teens in highschool before he started his college education.
- dozzie 9y agoCryptography is one prominent example. Modern compilers would be another (though an amateur can go here a little farther than in others, because of parser generators and such). Operating systems more sophisticated than a toy-grade proof of concept is yet another. And writing (again, non-toy-grade) databases. And formal verification of programs, this is hard to learn on one's own, too.