4 ms·
Encoding speed of x265 (if you haven't got a very recent graphics cards) is really bad, but files are around 40-60% smaller than x264.
by kevingrahl 9y ago
Encoding speed of x265 (if you haven't got a very recent graphics cards) is really bad, but files are around 40-60% smaller than x264.
- roryisok 9y ago> 40-60% smaller than x264 Holy crap. Is that using Pied Piper compression or something?
- tracker1 9y agoh.265 (HEVC) compresses fairly differently, the modes and fallback methods are also better the higher the detail (dimensions)... with x.264 (AVC) you get pixelation, with HEVC you get blurring... for a 1080p or 4K output, this is MUCH more pleasant to watch and allows for some shortcuts that aren't as noisy. One of the first things I noticed when first seeing DirectTV and DVD quality, for example was the pixelation of things, usually in the background... to this day it sometimes distracts me... that alone is about enough for me. The way regions are selected for compression is also better, but I'm not into the technical details enough to explain well... all I know is I can get about 5/3 to 5/2 more content in HEVC while at an equivalent or better quality. So yeah, it's a big deal...