4 ms·

Having lived in both for a few years each I can definitely say that SF is cheaper, at least on a per-sqft basis. You also earn twice as much in SF (plus the eq

by flog 9y ago

Having lived in both for a few years each I can definitely say that SF is cheaper, at least on a per-sqft basis. You also earn twice as much in SF (plus the equity lottery). That all said: SF certainly ain't no London. I'd still pick London any day of the week.

baby 9y ago
> That all said: SF certainly ain't no London. I'd still pick London any day of the week. Why's that? I've been working in London for a month and was looking into SF for next year. (So far I really like London.)