4 ms·
This piece reminds me of http://www.salon.com/2015/09/26/how_to_explain_the_kgbs_amazing_success_identifying_cia_agents_in_the_field/ http://www.salon.com/2015/
by linkmotif 9y ago
This piece reminds me of http://www.salon.com/2015/09/26/how_to_explain_the_kgbs_amazing_success_identifying_cia_agents_in_the_field/ http://www.salon.com/2015/09/26/how_to_explain_the_kgbs_amaz...
"What Totrov came up with were 26 unchanging indicators as a model for identifying U.S. intelligence officers overseas."
- whatnotests 9y agoI was looking for a list of those 26 indicators and found this article: https://lunghu.wordpress.com/tag/yuri-trotov/ https://lunghu.wordpress.com/tag/yuri-trotov/
- secfirstmd 9y agoIf your looking for indicators of surveillance teams, we've got quite a bit on it in Umbrella. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.secfirst.umbrella https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.secfirst.u...
- nonbel 9y ago>"The invariable indicators...agency officers usually had more than one working foreign language, their cover was usually as a “political” or “consular” official (often vice-consul); internal embassy reorganizations usually left agency personnel untouched" Reading stuff like this is really irritating. Do the author and editors not know the meaning of "unchanging and invariable"? It just makes the entire article seem idiotic.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- xkcd-sucks 9y agoOutside of formally defined abstract systems, "invariant" almost always means "usual"
- vorg 9y agoAnd "impossible" means "difficult". I believe this feature of natural language is called hyperbole, and its study is part of the Linguistics subfield of Pragmatics.
- nonbel 9y agoI am a native English speaker and have never heard someone use "unchangeable" or "invariable" to mean anything other than the correct meaning: "not variable; not changing or capable of being changed; static or constant."