3 ms·
>If someone enters into an unenforceable agreement, they should be freed of it speedily and inexpensively. Maybe the terms of the agreement are such that its' u
by rhapsodic 9y ago
>If someone enters into an unenforceable agreement, they should be freed of it speedily and inexpensively. Maybe the terms of the agreement are such that its' unenforceability is non-obvious; but it is ultimately the one bringing suit who should bear the cost of wasting everyone's time in that case.
Unfortunately, the Democratic party in the US has fought tooth-and-nail against "loser pays" tort reform for decades.
- solidsnack9000 9y agoI hope I answered your original question, with regards to the parallel to feudalism. In a different legal climate it might not play out that way; but in the current one it does.