2 ms·

I don't disagree that that's their definition. I wish you'd stop repeating it. It's that definition that's so stupid. Conflating "form" with distribution as if

I don't disagree that that's their definition. I wish you'd stop repeating it. It's that definition that's so stupid. Conflating "form" with distribution as if the latter affects the first. No, I'll give you a chance... But how do you think they review these things? It used to be DVD screeners but (ironically, here) Cannes set up an online VOD service for screeners. How do you assess something that has to be available via cinemas, on computer via a wonky streaming service? This rule is simple (and classic French) protectionism of a distribution channel that is failing to compete.

olavk 9y ago
It is a film festival for cineastes - film lovers or film snobs if you will. Its whole culture. For them there is a big difference between the big-screen cinema experience and watching home video. It is certainly a bigger difference than just the means of distribution. I think it was David Lynch who said "If you haven't see my movies in a cinema, then you haven't seen my movies". You may not care for this difference, but why does it anger you so that others do?