"To provide and maintain the capability to disclose, where practicable, the communications, equipment data and other information in an intelligible form to stan

"To provide and maintain the capability to disclose, where practicable, the communications, equipment data and other information in an intelligible form to standards specified in the notice and to remove electronic protection applied by or on behalf of the telecommunications operator to those communications, equipment data or other information, or to permit the person to whom the warrant is addressed to remove such electronic protection." Could this be interpreted, legally, to exempt end-to-end encryption? - When implemented properly (i.e. with proper key verification UIs) it should not be "practicable" for communications operators to force disclosure of the contents of users' communications. - End-to-end encryption is not "applied by [..] the operator" but rather applied by the users' device.