> My pick for year is 1878. Very funny. > I guess if you want to go by money, i'm going to pick 1939. You listed several great films, but I'm not disputing t

> My pick for year is 1878. Very funny. > I guess if you want to go by money, i'm going to pick 1939. You listed several great films, but I'm not disputing there were years with several great films, that's a completely separate point. > But really, how do you quantify good? Taste is subjective. I will concede that if we adopt a radical skepticism towards all aesthetic values then the claim "every year has bad films" collapses. However, if we agree to make that move... the original claim that "everything in the theater now is terrible" is also false. Or "there's something special (and bad) about the quality of film at this very moment" also collapses. So I'm good with this move. I accept the gambit.