3 ms·
There are multiple ways to interpret QM which all work out on paper and experimentally agree. There's nothing wrong with the "intellectual respectability" of no
by DonbunEf7 9y ago
There are multiple ways to interpret QM which all work out on paper and experimentally agree. There's nothing wrong with the "intellectual respectability" of non-Copenhagen interpretations, other than historical stigmata.
Edit: If you're worked up about "stigmata", just wait for "schemata", "indices", and "alumni".
- colorint 9y ago>historical stigmata I only point out typos that are silly, so with that in mind: Stigmata is where you develop sores or bleeding on your hands as some sort of weird solidarity with Jesus. I imagine that would make writing papers harder.
- contras1970 9y agostigmata is the plural form of stigma, which is 1 a archaic : a scar left by a hot iron b : a mark of shame or discredit https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stigmata https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stigmata
- tossaway1 9y agoThe link you provided says > "When the plural form stigmata is used, it usually refers to the nail wounds on Christ's hands and feet, wounds which have sometimes reappeared on the hands or feet of later worshippers such as St. Francis."
- contras1970 9y agousually !~ (always|only). OP's usage was fine and the complainant looked more ignorant than petty.
- roywiggins 9y agoIt's a perfectly cromulent plural, but it immediately brings Jesus to mind, and I'm solidly non-religious and not even raised Christian.