3 ms·
Only a little. I was going to write that it was a different version because the updated versions have been frequently ported to new platforms, but that's not p
by LeifCarrotson 10y ago
Only a little. I was going to write that it was a different version because the updated versions have been frequently ported to new platforms, but that's not proof, they might have changed their pattern. And while the new codebase seems more portable and flexible, there's no reason the Switch couldn't be made to run Java.
The proof is that while the Java version runs acceptably on a modern PC - which is all it needs to do - a PC with the performance of the Switch would not be capable of this performance level. Instead, the Pocket edition running on phones would be closer to this performance.
(Also, you might be misreading me because I forgot "PC version" between "the" and "at 720p".)