> does that mean the two parents must be and remain miserable solely for the sake of their children Is there really nothing on the spectrum between madly in lo

> does that mean the two parents must be and remain miserable solely for the sake of their children Is there really nothing on the spectrum between madly in love and miserable? Even if so, the answer is yes. Remain miserable until the children turn into adults, because that is the responsibility you signed up for when you had children under a marriage contract. Otherwise you're just a shitty parent. You can't have it both ways. > being in an open relationship changes the nature of their relationship Being in an open relationship is almost always a ticket for the woman to be unfaithful and shirk away from holding up her part of the contract. Why do you think that is?