4 ms·
I ended up walking out about halfway through it. I had no problems with the casting (I though Scarlet did a good job), and the visual effects were stunning. It
by chiph 9y ago
I ended up walking out about halfway through it. I had no problems with the casting (I though Scarlet did a good job), and the visual effects were stunning. It was the writing and plot that weren't good. I found it missing all the implied sub-plots (it was overly simple - as you said - dumbed down).
I also found myself missing the interludes from the animated film. The scenes with the canals, the jet passing overhead between the buildings. They all had a beauty to them and they let you reflect on what happened in the previous scene. This film proceeded too quickly from one scene to another, likely because the studio was afraid people would get bored if something wasn't happening every single moment.
- firasd 9y agoI agree, I was actually hoping the montage where she walks around the city with no dialog would be in the movie. Even without that, it felt like they rushed the tempo and deleted scenes. But: I also saw casual viewers say the movie was boring, they were falling asleep in the theater, etc. So it seems like GITS 17 tried (and failed) to balance to be a Hollywood blockbuster and GITS at the same time.