4 ms·
You can argue intent all you want (and btw no one has described the employee as a whistle-blower) However, as a matter of fact, Sprint's exaggeration (claiming
by credo 16y ago
You can argue intent all you want (and btw no one has described the employee as a whistle-blower)
However, as a matter of fact, Sprint's exaggeration (claiming that sales were around 3 times as much as they really were) was exposed by what that employee did.
- sree_nair 16y ago>> btw no one has described the employee as a whistle-blower "publicly exposed exaggerated Android EVO sales numbers" reads like he is a whistle blower. and it doesn't express what really happend. I totally agree to your second point.