4 ms·
It'd make sense if Hyper-V wasn't monopolistic. You can't run both at the same time, or better, no other virtualization host is allowed when Hyper-V is on. Whic
by mihular 9y ago
It'd make sense if Hyper-V wasn't monopolistic. You can't run both at the same time, or better, no other virtualization host is allowed when Hyper-V is on. Which sucks.
- sjark 9y agoThe problem there if I am not mistaken is the CPU Virtualization extensions that can't handle multiple hypervisors using them at the same time.
- tinus_hn 9y agoThat's true but it sure is convenient for Microsoft, and they are exploiting it as far as they can with the Credential Guard feature.
- mihular 9y agoAlso other virtualization hosts on the desktop don't have this problem at all. You can run all of the others at the same time.
- IntelMiner 9y agoSure is convenient for Red Hat, that you can't run KVM and Xen at the same time Sure is convenient for VMware that you can't run Virtualbox and VMware Workstation at the same time Absolutely a business decision by Microsoft, and not a limitation of the x86 chip