10 ms·

Cool looking server rack doors. Reminds me of a conversation I had with a designer at IBM Raleigh. He showed me models of some of the server rack designs that

by coleca 9y ago

Cool looking server rack doors. Reminds me of a conversation I had with a designer at IBM Raleigh. He showed me models of some of the server rack designs that he worked on at IBM for their super computers (I think it was Blue Gene). He said they had a bunch of CIOs that were upset after having spent ungodly sums of money on a fancy new IBM supercomputer and seeing it look just like all the other miscellaneous racks of servers in their datacenter when they went on a tour. So to appease these CIOs, they created all kinds of designs on the rack doors that looked like DNA sequences on the server doors so that you could 'tell' this cluster was doing gene sequencing just by looking at it and the CIO could proudly show off his new toy.

crwalker 9y ago
Communicating functionality is just as important as functionality.
spitfire 9y ago
SGI used to have super cool systems like this. You knew you were getting $40K worth of value because your workstation looked like it was worth $40K. Look up SGI O2, Octane, Indy, etc. Similar in the servers with the Onyx and Origin servers. They looked like you had gotten your moneys worth. And at the time, you did.
- mturmon 9y ago
  The SGI kit definitely had looks that were a notch above the competing workstations of the time: http://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/blog/Entries/2015/2/18_The_evolution_of_the_power_workstation_files/powerworkstations-1990s.jpg http://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/blog/Entries/2015/2/...
  - mbreese 9y ago
    Yeah, the O2 and Octane looked great, but their cases felt like cheap plastic up close. I remember being very unimpressed with my first exposure to an SGI workstation because of this. Actually working on it was great... it was just that the cheap plastic of the case ruined the entire effect.
    - enf 9y ago
      The previous generation (Indy/Indigo2) felt rock solid. The cheap feel of the O2 was a real let down. But they probably couldn't justify the cost of making really nice keyboards and cases once Linux became serious competition in every other way.
- yellowapple 9y ago
  Sun's later workstations looked super cool, too. I've got a red Sun Blade 1500; won't boot (blown caps on motherboard), but I keep it around because it looks badass.
greglindahl 9y ago
Actually, Blue Gene didn't look like a bunch of racks of gear -- it had air ducts with a very distinctive slope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Gene https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Gene
- davidmr 9y ago
  I spent a couple of years running the I/O system on the Blue Gene in that photograph (Intrepid). The pictures really don't do it justice, although all the doors are off in that photo, so that wasn't even really what it looked like. It was a big, beautiful, $100m black box. ANL's new system, Mira has a big mural painted on it, and I think it completely ruins the aesthetic. I don't miss working in that room, though. The box is very pretty, but the fans are astoundingly loud. As an aside, it's pretty amazing how much heat they need to dissipate. Once a year we had to do a cooling failure test where we all sat in the room by our respective subsystems while Facilities turned off the A/C just to make sure everything would notice the temperature rise and power itself off. When the A/C got cut, you felt the room start to heat up quite quickly almost instantly, within a few seconds.
  - gbrown_ 9y ago
    Calling Mira new is a bit of a stretch (delivered in 2012?). The BlueGene/Q systems, of which Mira is, are freakishly quiet. I work in a place that used to have POWER systems with a similar cooling setup and it was the quietest machine room I have ever stepped foot in.
    - davidmr 9y ago
      Semantic quibbles aside, water cooling is a godsend for one's ears.
      - greglindahl 9y ago
        Wear musicians' earplugs; they're great for airplanes, too.
iamacynic 9y ago
to be fair, eye catching industrial design simply sells more product. people want nice looking stuff that stands out.
- protomyth 9y ago
  We have a iStarUSA 12-drive unit in our server room. Instead of a sane color they used purple for the drive LED colors. It is clearly visible from outside and we have gotten a lot of positive comments since installing it. I guess flash sells. I am deeply tempted to rig up and LED display that is bright but informative.
mortenjorck 9y ago
The designer handbag pattern is more interesting than a black 19" rack cover, but I'd also consider it a far cry from the truly unique industrial design of vintage Cray. Granted, modern datacenter infrastructure has a lot more constraints than 30-40 years ago, but there are companies today (like IBM) that do interesting things within the rack format.
- Bluestrike2 9y ago
  The Cray-1 and XM-P always grabbed my attention in photos. They gave me the impression of a designer dreaming for "the future" and trying to capture that hopeful feeling in hardware.
rbanffy 9y ago
I recently commented the same - there was a time supercomputers looked cool. I'd totally design one where the rack doors would display rack status, failed hardware at that position (it makes so much easier to find the module that needs service if it's glowing red) and/or various performance stats - energy consumption, temperature map etc, just because adding it wouldn't make the computer that much more expensive and would add to brand recognition. A computer that looks like a bunch of racks has less cool photos than one that looks really awesome.
- convolvatron 9y ago
  i completely agree. while there is a lot of science that gets done, supercomputing is largely image driven. however, supercomputing is really a losing game. by the time you've gone you're in the second year of a project, over budget, behind schedule, and you're just trying to make sure you don't lose too much on the deal - doing the design, engineering and fabrication for a super cool faring isn't anywhere near the top of your list...and if it was, its not anymore i guess the other problem is that you're already spending a lot of engineering to get that information into some other system for display and analysis. its actually a lot more effective to look at a visualization of the overall thermal map (or power, or network queue depths, or...) than to have colored leds on the chassis. but i used to sit in front of a connection machine all day, and i could tell what was running and how different it was from the admittedly very low bandwidth front led display. and it made great pictures. and since they were card edge on the actual boards with a diffuser in front on slides...it was likely much less than %1 of cost.
monocasa 9y ago
I'm rather fond of IBM's z13 mainframe. It just looks like the future as viewed by someone in 2005. https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/20150114afmimb-sysz-0031.jpg?w=738 https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/2015011...
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]

by coleca 9y ago

crwalker 9y ago

Communicating functionality is just as important as functionality.

spitfire 9y ago

SGI used to have super cool systems like this. You knew you were getting $40K worth of value because your workstation looked like it was worth $40K. Look up SGI O2, Octane, Indy, etc. Similar in the servers with the Onyx and Origin servers. They looked like you had gotten your moneys worth. And at the time, you did.

mturmon 9y ago
The SGI kit definitely had looks that were a notch above the competing workstations of the time: http://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/blog/Entries/2015/2/18_The_evolution_of_the_power_workstation_files/powerworkstations-1990s.jpg http://triosdevelopers.com/jason.eckert/blog/Entries/2015/2/...
- mbreese 9y ago
  Yeah, the O2 and Octane looked great, but their cases felt like cheap plastic up close. I remember being very unimpressed with my first exposure to an SGI workstation because of this. Actually working on it was great... it was just that the cheap plastic of the case ruined the entire effect.
  - enf 9y ago
    The previous generation (Indy/Indigo2) felt rock solid. The cheap feel of the O2 was a real let down. But they probably couldn't justify the cost of making really nice keyboards and cases once Linux became serious competition in every other way.
yellowapple 9y ago
Sun's later workstations looked super cool, too. I've got a red Sun Blade 1500; won't boot (blown caps on motherboard), but I keep it around because it looks badass.

greglindahl 9y ago

Actually, Blue Gene didn't look like a bunch of racks of gear -- it had air ducts with a very distinctive slope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Gene https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Gene

davidmr 9y ago
I spent a couple of years running the I/O system on the Blue Gene in that photograph (Intrepid). The pictures really don't do it justice, although all the doors are off in that photo, so that wasn't even really what it looked like. It was a big, beautiful, $100m black box. ANL's new system, Mira has a big mural painted on it, and I think it completely ruins the aesthetic. I don't miss working in that room, though. The box is very pretty, but the fans are astoundingly loud. As an aside, it's pretty amazing how much heat they need to dissipate. Once a year we had to do a cooling failure test where we all sat in the room by our respective subsystems while Facilities turned off the A/C just to make sure everything would notice the temperature rise and power itself off. When the A/C got cut, you felt the room start to heat up quite quickly almost instantly, within a few seconds.
- gbrown_ 9y ago
  Calling Mira new is a bit of a stretch (delivered in 2012?). The BlueGene/Q systems, of which Mira is, are freakishly quiet. I work in a place that used to have POWER systems with a similar cooling setup and it was the quietest machine room I have ever stepped foot in.
  - davidmr 9y ago
    Semantic quibbles aside, water cooling is a godsend for one's ears.
    - greglindahl 9y ago
      Wear musicians' earplugs; they're great for airplanes, too.

iamacynic 9y ago

to be fair, eye catching industrial design simply sells more product. people want nice looking stuff that stands out.

protomyth 9y ago
We have a iStarUSA 12-drive unit in our server room. Instead of a sane color they used purple for the drive LED colors. It is clearly visible from outside and we have gotten a lot of positive comments since installing it. I guess flash sells. I am deeply tempted to rig up and LED display that is bright but informative.

mortenjorck 9y ago

The designer handbag pattern is more interesting than a black 19" rack cover, but I'd also consider it a far cry from the truly unique industrial design of vintage Cray. Granted, modern datacenter infrastructure has a lot more constraints than 30-40 years ago, but there are companies today (like IBM) that do interesting things within the rack format.

Bluestrike2 9y ago
The Cray-1 and XM-P always grabbed my attention in photos. They gave me the impression of a designer dreaming for "the future" and trying to capture that hopeful feeling in hardware.

rbanffy 9y ago

I recently commented the same - there was a time supercomputers looked cool. I'd totally design one where the rack doors would display rack status, failed hardware at that position (it makes so much easier to find the module that needs service if it's glowing red) and/or various performance stats - energy consumption, temperature map etc, just because adding it wouldn't make the computer that much more expensive and would add to brand recognition. A computer that looks like a bunch of racks has less cool photos than one that looks really awesome.

convolvatron 9y ago
i completely agree. while there is a lot of science that gets done, supercomputing is largely image driven. however, supercomputing is really a losing game. by the time you've gone you're in the second year of a project, over budget, behind schedule, and you're just trying to make sure you don't lose too much on the deal - doing the design, engineering and fabrication for a super cool faring isn't anywhere near the top of your list...and if it was, its not anymore i guess the other problem is that you're already spending a lot of engineering to get that information into some other system for display and analysis. its actually a lot more effective to look at a visualization of the overall thermal map (or power, or network queue depths, or...) than to have colored leds on the chassis. but i used to sit in front of a connection machine all day, and i could tell what was running and how different it was from the admittedly very low bandwidth front led display. and it made great pictures. and since they were card edge on the actual boards with a diffuser in front on slides...it was likely much less than %1 of cost.

monocasa 9y ago

I'm rather fond of IBM's z13 mainframe. It just looks like the future as viewed by someone in 2005. https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/20150114afmimb-sysz-0031.jpg?w=738 https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/2015011...

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]