3 ms·

Naming it on a suspicion alone would be irresponsible.

• jacquesm 9y ago
  That's a qualified statement, there is nothing irresponsible about that. Telematics companies bear close watching anyway. Right now it is as far as I'm concerned a content free statement.
  • GavinMcG 9y ago
    It's absolutely irresponsible, even with qualifications, given what we now know about how people use that information. Witch hunts happen even with qualified statements, and down the road people who read qualified statements tend to forget the qualification and give the negativity more weight than it deserves.
    • sofaofthedamned 9y ago
      Thank you. Knowing like most industries, the layers of ODMs and OEMs etc, it's hard to pin down who exactly is responsible for a security cockup. And, funnily enough, having an interview there I wasn't inclined to do a recce on their infrastructure. Also, not having a device, I didn't have endpoints or traffic to test.