2 ms·
Semantic wankery: They did not say "in 2004", "at the time", or anything of the sort. They said around 100 dpi is "the ideal resolution" — no qualifiers except
by jarek 16y ago
Semantic wankery: They did not say "in 2004", "at the time", or anything of the sort. They said around 100 dpi is "the ideal resolution" — no qualifiers except for "after years of experience".
I realize they meant this and I realize they didn't say it because Apple marketing tries very hard to not confuse users with not-strictly-necessary detail (and to make sufficiently general statements to be as generous to Apple products as possible without being outright misleading, but I digress). But no, they did not say it was the best compromise they could get at the time -- they said it was the absolute best.
edit: can the two downvoters state why they don't feel this correction of a statement regarding what "Apple said" adds to this discussion?