3 ms·
c3 is decent, but it is no longer maintained and with 675 issues and counting, it's the wrong choice for any new project. We've had it in production for a coup
by mparr4 9y ago
c3 is decent, but it is no longer maintained and with 675 issues and counting, it's the wrong choice for any new project.
We've had it in production for a couple of years now. The best thing about it was it got us off the ground quickly but at this point I think we've likely sunk more hours into debugging issues and hacking features than it would have cost us to have built it with d3.