3 ms·
Exactly...cost was supposed to be a new premium roof (just the roof, no solar panels) and they are about 3 times more expensive than "just the roof". Unless th
by canterburry 9y ago
Exactly...cost was supposed to be a new premium roof (just the roof, no solar panels) and they are about 3 times more expensive than "just the roof".
Unless they meant a "new roof" as in when you build a house from scratch and you don't have rafters or anything. If you have an existing roof you are redoing every 20 years or so, then this is definitely not the cost of a "new roof".
So, which "new roof" are we talking about here?
- greglindahl 9y agoSorry, where'd you get a quote for, say, a "Spanish" tile roof that inexpensive? And yeah, he did say (in the launch video) that the electricity was a part of the computation.
- jhall1468 9y ago> cost was supposed to be a new premium roof (just the roof, no solar panels) That makes very little sense. You're making an apples to oranges comparison here. It would be absolutely impossible to pull that off. It's literally the premium roof + solar and you want it to be the same price as premium roof (thus, you want the solar hardware to cost nothing. Only one of these generates electricity, thus saving you money and that must be included in the cost calculation in order to determine the actual cost.
- MagnumOpus 9y ago> It would be absolutely impossible to pull that off And yet it was promised by Musk. Literally "a solar roof will actually cost less than a normal roof before you even take the value of electricity into account". Don't attack your parent poster for Musk's lies.