4 ms·

Since everyone seems to agree with you I find it odd that more people aren't flagging this article. I've said it many times, please stop up-voting all the Apple

Since everyone seems to agree with you I find it odd that more people aren't flagging this article. I've said it many times, please stop up-voting all the Apple articles. They don't belong here and nearly every one of them is discovered to be crap or inaccurate. Even after someone points it out and gets up-voted for it the article still remains on the front page. Exercise your ability to clean up HN -- flag!

dcurtis 16y ago
While I seem to have negligently exaggerated on the exclusivity of the iPhone 4's resolution independence, the spirit of the article is still there and the points are still valid. iOS's implementation of resolution independence is the best and most standardized implementation that exists.
- coderdude 16y ago
  That's fine, but it doesn't save it from the fact that programmers and entrepreneurs don't need to be overly pre-occupied with information about Apple, its products, or its CEO all day long.
- ergo98 16y ago
  So you start with "Sure I was wrong", but then you head on to- "iOS's implementation of resolution independence is the best and most standardized implementation that exists." How do you know that? You don't even know that alternatives even exist, and here you're passing absolute judgment on them? Sorry, but you're woefully ill-equipped to make that statement.
- boucher 16y ago
  Not really. I don't know how much you know about how it actually works, but it's a much bigger mess than what you are describing in the article. OS X isn't really built from the ground up to be resolution independent, and linking to articles about quartz is kind of misleading, given that a lot of the graphics layer of iOS is completely different than the graphics layer of Mac OS X. It may be easier on OS X than other platforms, I don't really know, but Mac OS X, despite a lot of talk over the last 4 years or so, remains not fully resolution independent, and the new iOS approach is a pretty big departure from what has been going on in Mac OS X.
  - yoden 16y ago
    It's actually far harder on OS X than any modern Windows or Gnome system (don't know about KDE)
rantfoil 16y ago
You must be new here. Standard reply here: If you don't like it, don't vote it up. Also: Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did. http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- coderdude 16y ago
  I didn't vote it up nor did I tell anyone that I flagged it. I did break the rule that we should not attempt to coerce others into flagging an article. Thanks for pointing that out, but no thanks for the inflammatory "you must be new here." It's difficult to respect someone being snarky for no reason.

dcurtis 16y ago

While I seem to have negligently exaggerated on the exclusivity of the iPhone 4's resolution independence, the spirit of the article is still there and the points are still valid. iOS's implementation of resolution independence is the best and most standardized implementation that exists.

coderdude 16y ago
That's fine, but it doesn't save it from the fact that programmers and entrepreneurs don't need to be overly pre-occupied with information about Apple, its products, or its CEO all day long.
ergo98 16y ago
So you start with "Sure I was wrong", but then you head on to- "iOS's implementation of resolution independence is the best and most standardized implementation that exists." How do you know that? You don't even know that alternatives even exist, and here you're passing absolute judgment on them? Sorry, but you're woefully ill-equipped to make that statement.
boucher 16y ago
Not really. I don't know how much you know about how it actually works, but it's a much bigger mess than what you are describing in the article. OS X isn't really built from the ground up to be resolution independent, and linking to articles about quartz is kind of misleading, given that a lot of the graphics layer of iOS is completely different than the graphics layer of Mac OS X. It may be easier on OS X than other platforms, I don't really know, but Mac OS X, despite a lot of talk over the last 4 years or so, remains not fully resolution independent, and the new iOS approach is a pretty big departure from what has been going on in Mac OS X.
- yoden 16y ago
  It's actually far harder on OS X than any modern Windows or Gnome system (don't know about KDE)

rantfoil 16y ago

You must be new here. Standard reply here: If you don't like it, don't vote it up. Also: Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did. http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

coderdude 16y ago
I didn't vote it up nor did I tell anyone that I flagged it. I did break the rule that we should not attempt to coerce others into flagging an article. Thanks for pointing that out, but no thanks for the inflammatory "you must be new here." It's difficult to respect someone being snarky for no reason.