3 ms·
I don't think that whoever is using this kind of app is expecting to act on every single "violation". It is just nice and convenient that all of the "violations
by filoleg 10y ago
I don't think that whoever is using this kind of app is expecting to act on every single "violation". It is just nice and convenient that all of the "violations" are recorded, so that if something goes down, there is a documentation in form of pictures/timestamps to back it all up.
- wang_li 10y agoSeems to be a pretty useful technology. As a MSFT stock owner it'll be nice to be able to go back to the video and figure out exactly when Nadella made the bad decision. This sort of monitoring and recording will be utilized with CEOs and executives and such, right?
- filoleg 10y agoThis is about safety, not about making "bad decisions". Do executives risk their lives and health daily? What about someone working with heavy machinery?
- sixbrx 10y agoI'm guessing that the buyers will decide for themselves what it will be "about", lacking any privisos about allowed usage in the fine print.
- s73ver 10y agoAt first? Maybe not. But once you have that kind of power, it's hard to give up.
- mgkimsal 10y agoyou move in to selective enforcement. there will be recorded violations of something for pretty much everyone, and only a handful of people will have access to it, and they'll selective enforce as they see fit. but maybe if you do this one little favor for them, they'll look the other way (for a spell).
- filoleg 10y agoI mean, that kind of selective enforcement is possible right now as well, cameras have been available for quite a while. I don't think that the technology shown today has added anything important for those who want to powertrip in the way you described.