3 ms·
Was about to suggest that before I saw your comment. It’s like that PostgreSQL vs Postgres naming fiasco all over again. It’s not even the association, which I
by deno 9y ago
Was about to suggest that before I saw your comment. It’s like that PostgreSQL vs Postgres naming fiasco all over again.
It’s not even the association, which I actually think is great, the name is simply a mouthful. RoachDB rolls off the tongue just so much better.
- crudbug 9y agoYeah .. "SQL" in product name is just lame. Its a culture, I always omit SQL from Postgres.
- deno 9y agoOn second thought I’m not sure. Everyone will call it RoachDB for short anyway, but the full name has more impact. It shocks, which is a good thing. I was so focused on aesthetics that I didn’t even consider strategy. They can always spin off “RoachDB” as an enterprise option, if they have any problems with selling it due to name.