3 ms·
I don't think the intent is to compromise on these :) But lots of things can be made easier to learn via better tooling, better docs, or better diagnostics. Or
by Manishearth 9y ago
I don't think the intent is to compromise on these :)
But lots of things can be made easier to learn via better tooling, better docs, or better diagnostics. Or just removing papercuts.
One such thing I've recently been thinking about is https://github.com/Manishearth/rust-clippy/issues/1737 https://github.com/Manishearth/rust-clippy/issues/1737 , which would be cool if it got big.
- kbenson 9y agoOh, that would be nice. :) Rust, being largely of new things (in implementation and and presentation, if not theory), has plenty of room currently to explore changes and features that have little or no negative aspects. I'm a little worried about what happens when the low hanging fruit is fine though. That said, rust has been very good so far at assessing the merit of proposed changes. I recall a few months back that reasoning was explained, and it assessed positive and negative aspects on a few well defined axes.