> Not only have tabloids been doing it, but all journalism--just look at the 1890s and how "fake" news was. Except now there's so much happening so fast, we ca

> Not only have tabloids been doing it, but all journalism--just look at the 1890s and how "fake" news was. Except now there's so much happening so fast, we can't keep up! Plus with "personalisation", no one's experience is the same. What a headache for future historians. There's still a few that takes journalism seriously; the Guardian is one. But none can claim absolute truth or neutrality. So fake or not, I guess we still have to resort to multiple sources - or even better, stick our heads in the sand until the madness is over! (That may or may not be taken as tongue in cheek..)