3 ms·
I believe it's just going to keep going higher: more and more (legitimate, blue-chip) institutions see the value in Bitcoin for moving currency around due to it
by DaiPlusPlus 10y ago
I believe it's just going to keep going higher: more and more (legitimate, blue-chip) institutions see the value in Bitcoin for moving currency around due to its near-zero transaction fees, rapid clearing, and the impossibility of chargebacks - and given there's a cap of 21m BTC it means deflation is going to keep going on, if not accelerating further. I do expect to see BTC reach $10k or $20k within 5 years, even if it crashes this year.
I don't know if BTC will reach $100k or even $1m - it depends on how the rest of the financial industry treats it - or if there's a mass ditching of BTC for ETH or possibly even a bank-controlled blockchain.
BTC has one hurdle coming up: the darknets - the original populizers of BTC - are switching to Monero due to its increased privacy protections.
- vizzah 10y ago"near-zero transaction fees"? I wish.. it currently costs ~$1 to have your transaction executed within 10-30 minutes (next block).
- codexon 10y ago"rapid clearing" as well. Takes a while to wait for the recommended number of confirms.
- Taek 10y agoNot compared to wire transfers or credit card clearing, which can take 3 and 30 days, respectively.
- matt_wulfeck 10y agoYeah honestly, why do people keep saying this? Real life bitcoin transactions are much more expensive to users than credit card or ACH transfers. I can move money for free between my bank accounts and the money is settled in three days. I can pay friends for free with venmo and it settles likewise. Bitcoin needs to become significantly faster and cheaper, since there's nothing holding back the competition from getting more efficient from self-imposed limits.
- sf_rob 10y ago>why do people keep saying this? Because they're confusing theoretical transaction costs with reality. This isn't an insurmountable technical limitation; this is a political issue within the miner community.
- asciimo 10y agoThat's still pretty great compared to wire transfers (~$15 fee, up to 72hrs). But I get your point; larger blocks can improve that greatly.
- Symbiote 10y agoMaybe for the US, but in other western countries the fee is generally zero for individuals, or a few cents for businesses, and the time a few hours at most (often seconds).
- tom_mellior 10y agoIn what western countries do you have wire transfers within hours? My experience in several EU countries is about two working days for transfers to be credited to the other person's account.
- Symbiote 10y agoWe must have different EU countries — though the EU is aiming for these systems to be available across the Eurozone by the end of the year (!) [1]. I know for certain it's very fast (around a minute, but the guaranteed time is <2 hours) for the UK, Denmark and Sweden. I think Norway and Finland have similar systems. The British system is called Faster Payments: http://www.fasterpayments.org.uk/about-us http://www.fasterpayments.org.uk/about-us — I doubt the others have easily accessible information in English. [1] https://www.nfcworld.com/2017/01/11/349411/european-central-bank-plans-instant-mobile-payments-end-2017/ https://www.nfcworld.com/2017/01/11/349411/european-central-...
- tom_mellior 10y ago> We must have different EU countries Seems like it. France and Austria, in my case. If I pass a transfer in my French online banking system in the afternoon, my bank even tells me outright that it won't be processed until 8 o'clock the next morning (until which time I can undo it). It's then deducted from my account at that time, and the day after that the receiver sees the payment in their online banking as "you will be getting this money, but you don't have it yet, it's being processed". > EU is aiming for these systems to be available Well... it's "encouraging" providers to do it. Not holding my breath ;-)